ar X iv : 1 40 1 . 82 09 v 2 [ cs . L O ] 2 M ay 2 01 4 Propositional Logics Complexity and the Sub - Formula Property Edward
نویسنده
چکیده
In 1979 Richard Statman proved, using proof-theory, that the purely implicational fragment of Intuitionistic Logic (M→) is PSPACEcomplete. He showed a polynomially bounded translation from full Intuitionistic Propositional Logic into its implicational fragment. By the PSPACE-completeness of S4, proved by Ladner, and the Gödel translation from S4 into Intuitionistic Logic, the PSPACE-completeness of M→ is drawn. The sub-formula principle for a deductive system for a logic L states that whenever {γ1, . . . , γk} ⊢L α there is a proof in which each formula occurrence is either a sub-formula of α or of some of γi. In this work we extend Statman’s result and show that any propositional (possibly modal) structural logic satisfying a particular statement of the sub-formula principle is PSPACE-complete. As a consequence, EXPTIME-complete propositional logics, such as PDL and the commonknowledge epistemic logic with at least 2 agents satisfy this particular sub-formula principle, if and only if, PSPACE=EXPTIME.
منابع مشابه
ar X iv : 1 40 5 . 15 65 v 1 [ cs . L O ] 7 M ay 2 01 4 Tableau vs . Sequent Calculi for Minimal Entailment
In this paper we compare two proof systems for minimal entailment: a tableau system OTAB and a sequent calculus MLK , both developed by Olivetti (1992). Our main result shows that OTAB-proofs can be efficiently translated into MLK -proofs, i.e.,MLK psimulates OTAB . The simulation is technically very involved and answers an open question posed by Olivetti (1992) on the relation between the two ...
متن کاملar X iv : 1 30 7 . 55 92 v 4 [ cs . L O ] 2 6 N ov 2 01 3 Proof Search for Propositional Abstract Separation Logics via Labelled Sequents
Abstract separation logics are a family of extensions of Hoare logic for reasoning about programs that mutate memory. These logics are “abstract” because they are independent of any particular concrete memory model. Their assertion languages, called propositional abstract separation logics, extend the logic of (Boolean) Bunched Implications (BBI) in various ways. We develop a modular proof theo...
متن کاملar X iv : 1 70 5 . 10 11 5 v 1 [ cs . L O ] 2 9 M ay 2 01 7 Conservative Extensions in Guarded and Two - Variable Fragments ∗
We investigate the decidability and computational complexity of (deductive) conservative extensions in fragments of first-order logic (FO), with a focus on the two-variable fragment FO and the guarded fragment GF. We prove that conservative extensions are undecidable in any FO fragment that contains FO or GF (even the three-variable fragment thereof), and that they are decidable and 2ExpTime-co...
متن کاملar X iv : 0 90 5 . 01 97 v 1 [ cs . A I ] 2 M ay 2 00 9 An Application of Proof - Theory in Answer Set Programming
Using a characterization of stable models of logic programs P as satisfying valuations of a suitably chosen propositional theory, called the set of reduced defining equations rΦ P , we show that the finitary character of that theory rΦ P is equivalent to a certain continuity property of the Gelfond-Lifschitz operator GL P associated with the program P. The introduction of the formula rΦ P leads...
متن کاملar X iv : 0 90 6 . 40 82 v 2 [ m at h . L O ] 2 2 Ju l 2 00 9 Semantic interpolation ∗
We treat interpolation for various logics. In the full non-monotonic case, we connect the existence of interpolants to laws about abstract size, and to generalized Hamming relations. We also mention revision a la Parikh.
متن کامل